Friday, November 24, 2017
Thursday, November 23, 2017
As a preface, understand that Laurier has never had a reputation for being a good university. And that's why a clown with barely any publication history (Rambukkana), a MA from Trent and Ph.D. from Concordia, who's only an assistant prof, gets together with another essentially unpublished assistant prof who took 8 whole fucking years to complete a Ph.D. (Herbert Pimlott) to bully a grad student with all the zeal of a fucking scientologist.
Well, also, Laurier has no union for TAs.
Global - Laurier's handling of Lindsay Shepard case 'inexcusable'.
And actually, even if you leave the bullying out, and leave the fascist thought policing out, it's still inexcusable because of the following:
1. They've created a toxic workplace for Shepard. The bullying interview is malicious, and she has valid grounds for a lawsuit.
2. Because the toxic workplace is tied to her MA studies, she's got valid grounds to sue for her Laurier tuition and living expenses back, as well as for future career damage.
3. In addition, they slandered Jordan Peterson (no, not with the Hitler bit: they explicitly asserted that he intentionally and maliciously inflicts criminal damage on people who disagree with him, and the assertion is false). Peterson has grounds for a lawsuit.
I'm not a Rebel Media person (frankly, while I'm a hardcore classical liberal, I also believe your right to your opinions stops the moment you make me want to kick your teeth in for being a fucking asshole), and Peterson made his own trouble by aligning with Ezra Levant's dipshit website.
But I can tell you, as a university student, that there are hundreds of professors like this in the country, who have contributed nothing to scholarship but instead managed to get jobs by writing pseudointellectual bullshit. Their books are read by nobody, and whatever articles they do bother to write are essentially vanity publishing.
And by the way: they're not left wing, quit calling them that. Not a single one of these people will ever bring class or labour into their political analysis, because they were born into the petit bourgeoisie, they recognize themselves as thoroughly bourgeois, and they are thoroughly aligned with bourgeois class interests. That's why they feel they deserve six-figure salaries for spewing wordsalad.
So it's not "left wing" to advocate rabidly for trans rights, to the point of sounding like a lunatic: it's just cultist nonsense by bourgeois entitled pseuds whose university careers save them from having to fucking work for a living, who feel no need to contribute any real scholarship to the world.
As for Lindsay Shepard, she also made her own bed by doing an MA in Communication Studies.
Basically, it's all a war between useless entitled brats of the kleptocratic elite. Welcome back to the 18th century.
Wednesday, November 22, 2017
Gotta remember to watch Mr. Robot tonight, I missed it last week:
New Deal Demoncrat - still no DOOOOOM in the yield curve. No, it hasn't inverted. And as the charts show, the yield curve being flattish can go on for five years... of fantastic expansion like the late 1990s.
Calculated Risk - chemical activity barometer really positive. It's got a lead of about a year on industrial production. Though, actually, the US economic cycle is mostly governed by real estate, not industry.
Reuters - in Trump strongholds, some Dems want to go for broke. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if Beto O'Rourke's campaign to legalize marijuana and bring in universal health care wins him a Texas Senate seat. #1, Texas is demographically swinging left, we've known this for a decade. #2, maybe the reason Dems haven't been able to win in hardcore-Republican states is because they try too much to sound to sound like slightly-less-hateful Republicans?
I mean, if I were living in Nazi Germany I wouldn't vote for Mr. Slightly Less Hitler. I'd want to vote for Mr. About As Unlike Hitler As You Can Get.
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
I don't know why this isn't getting more play:
Guardian - interstellar spaceship arrives in our solar system. And yet they continue calling it an "asteroid" because the PTB don't want us mouth-breathing natives to get all worked up:
Astronomers are now certain that the mysterious object detected hurtling past our sun last month is indeed from another solar system. They have named it 1I/2017 U1(’Oumuamua)
'Oumuamua means "scout" in Hawaiian. Is there something they don't want us to know?
And if so, why are they telling us?
It is thought to be an extremely dark object, absorbing 96% of the light that falls on its surface, and it is red. This colour is the hallmark of organic (carbon-based) molecules. Organic molecules are the building blocks of the biological molecules that allow life to function.
Yeah, "red" like a warship, not like organic carbon molecules.
They are travelling too fast to be captured by the gravity of the sun.
Ask yourself: how likely is it that a dumb piece of rock can travel too fast to be captured by the Sun's gravitational well?
And if that's not enough, here's an "artist's representation" of this "asteroid":
Does THAT look like an "asteroid" to you? Yeah, right.
How likely is it that an "asteroid" is going to be so long and thin? Why hasn't it broken up along the long axis from torque or collisions, or compressed due to gravity? Was it just made a couple years ago?
In a spaceship factory by aliens?
This, ladies and gentlemen, is an interstellar spaceship. We have been found. Soon the aliens will attack.
Buy gold, cos blockchain won't mean dangly wobbly donkey dick when they take out all global communications and computers with their worldwide EMP attack.
Where the fuck is Jeff Berwick when you need him?
Monday, November 20, 2017
Home stretch before exams. Here's stuff:
New Deal Demoncrat - housing slump looks like it is ending. Is there no end to the bull market?
Bonddad - quit piddling your frilly pink panties. The junk bond doom is not all it's cracked up to be.
IPE Zone - Norway's $1T SWF divesting from oil. Frankly, they should have done this years ago: their income is heavily correlated with oil to begin with, and you're supposed to count your income stream as part of your investment portfolio.
FT - world's pool of negative-yielding debt swells to $11T. Because there's too much money and not enough places to invest it. I mean, what would you rather hold, cash?
BBC - Indonesia's Orang Rimba forced to renounce their faith. I guess now that we evil white colonizers have learned how evil we were to forcibly convert natives and steal their land, the brown people of the world can have their turn at being evil.
Saturday, November 18, 2017
Friday, November 17, 2017
Thursday, November 16, 2017
FRBSF - stock market evaluation and the macroeconomy. It pretty much illustrates why economists are so stupid when it comes to markets:
One valuation metric, the cyclically adjusted price-earnings or CAPE ratio for the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 stock index was originally developed by Campbell and Shiller (1998) to help judge whether the stock market is overvalued. The CAPE ratio is computed as the real, that is, inflation-adjusted, value of the S&P 500 divided by the real earnings of companies in the index averaged over the most recent 10 years. Campbell and Shiller found that higher values of the CAPE ratio predicted lower future real returns on stocks over subsequent 10-year periods.
Yes, and Shiller today says not to put too much stock into the CAPE, but you've never listened to him, you've only read about CAPE in university.
A parsimonious set of macroeconomic variables can account for much of the movement in the CAPE ratio over the past five decades. These variables include the “natural” real rate of interest, the growth rate of potential GDP, and the core inflation rate. Reasonable projections for these same macroeconomic variables over the next 10 years can provide a prediction about future movements in the CAPE ratio, which, in turn, will influence the magnitude of future stock returns.
#1, You can't project shit without including political inputs.
#2, r-star is something you made up. It doesn't exist in the real world. Nobody knows the natural rate of interest. And you might want to look under the hood to see what r-star is derived from, as I'll show later....
#3, Whose r-star are you using? The USA's? The entire world invests in US-listed equities, not just the USA. And there's no reason to expect r-star of each nation to converge.
#4, 5 decades is a heterogenous dataset. Regressing on it will be misleading.
A simple regression model can be used to assess how well macroeconomic variables explain movements in the CAPE ratio. Specifically, the model regresses the quarterly average CAPE ratio on a constant, the Laubach-Williams (LW) two-sided estimate of r-star, the CBO four-quarter growth rate of potential GDP, the 20-quarter change in the LW r-star estimate, and the four-quarter core PCE inflation rate. The explanatory variables are each lagged by one quarter in the regression equation to help account for real-time data availability issues.
Figure 4 plots fitted values of the CAPE ratio from the regression model through 2017:Q3. The fit is quite good, accounting for 70% of the variance in the actual CAPE ratio over the past five decades.
So you're finding co-movement between the CAPE and the following:
a) GDP growth and core PCE inflation, which are highly correlated with earnings.
b) Laubach-Williams r-star, which is a made up thing, and probably uses as its inputs things that are highly correlated with earnings, GDP growth and core PCE.
No wonder your R-squared is 70%! If you want to get it higher, maybe you can try dropping Laubach-Williams r-star entirely!
Absent further changes in the ratio, stock prices can rise only as fast as earnings. Over the past 30 years, real earnings for the S&P 500 have grown at an average compound rate of about 4% per year. A decline in the CAPE ratio from current levels would imply that stock prices must grow slower than earnings.
No, it wouldn't imply that. Because despite your graduating with an MA in Finance, Kevin, you've forgotten your basic portfolio theory: stock prices are dependent on supply and demand, and wealth is growing faster than growth in available investments.
Again, here's the simple question that I always ask: where else are people going to put their trillions? Bonds? Real estate? Cash?
WaPo - Democrats win seat in deep-red Oklahoma. Eventually the chickens come home to roost:
Democrats have flipped another statehouse seat in deeply conservative Oklahoma amid growing frustration over years of state budget shortfalls and recent scandals that led to the resignation of Republican incumbents.
Democrat Allison Ikley-Freeman defeated Republican Brian O’Hara in Tuesday’s special election for a state Senate seat representing parts of Tulsa. Complete but unofficial election results show that Ikley-Freeman, who is a therapist at a nonprofit mental health agency, won by 31 votes.
Doesn't sound particularly amazing, til you realize the district went for Trump by 40%.
That's what happens when your party are idiots: eventually everyone gets fed up with you:
The Legislature’s controlling party has failed during an ongoing special legislative session to push through tax increase plans that would bring new revenue to state coffers. Lawmakers now are considering bills that would balance the budget by raiding savings accounts and imposing cuts of about 2.5 percent to most state agencies.
Michael Whelan is a Democratic consultant who helped manage Ikley-Freeman’s campaign and the races of Democratic Reps. Karen Gaddis in Tulsa and Jacob Rosecrants in Norman, who both won Republican-held seats in special elections this year.
He attributes the Democrats’ success to a combination of factors that includes the state’s budget woes, voter dissatisfaction with President Trump and a series of scandals that have led to the resignation of four GOP incumbents this year.
“The formula has been very similar for each of these races,” Whelan said “There are a lot of Republicans out there with buyer’s remorse with President Trump, which naturally suppresses turnout.
“Then you’ve got scandal after scandal happening locally, and I think Republicans are losing faith in their brand a little bit.”
Proof that literally everyone eventually looks in the mirror.
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
Oh, those wacky Russkies. If they weren't trying to subvert democracy and replace it with a worldwide authoritarian kleptocratic plutocracy commanded by Vladimir Tiny-Penis Putin, you'd almost want to hug them for trying so hard:
BBC News - Russkies post screenshot of a video game to prove Americans are helping ISIS. No, really:
Russia's Ministry of Defence has posted what it called "irrefutable proof" of the US aiding so-called Islamic State - but one of the images was actually taken from a video game.
The ministry claimed the image showed an IS convoy leaving a Syrian town last week aided by US forces.
Instead, it came from the smartphone game AC-130 Gunship Simulator: Special Ops Squadron.
What a doomed pathetic nation Russia is.
The Trump news just keeps on Trumping!:
BBC - American government doesn't trust Trump with the nukes. Gee, wonder why:
Some senators present said they were troubled about the president's latitude to launch a nuclear strike.
Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, said: "We are concerned that the president is so unstable, is so volatile, has a decision-making process that is so quixotic, that he might order a nuclear-weapons strike that is wildly out of step with US national-security interests."
One of the experts, C Robert Kehler, who was commander of the US Strategic Command from 2011-13, said that in his former role he would have followed the president's order to carry out the strike - if it were legal.
He said if he were uncertain about its legality, he would have consulted with his own advisers.
Under certain circumstances, he explained: "I would have said, 'I'm not ready to proceed.'"
One senator, Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, asked: "Then what happens?"
Mr Kehler admitted: "I don't know."
People in the room laughed. But it was a nervous laugh.
The same laugh they laughed when Orange was elected, except now with nuclear weapons.
Monday, November 13, 2017
IPE Zone - rotting crops in Cornwall. Yup, apparently the Cornish, who voted to leave because they hate smelly Romanians, didn't realize that those smelly Romanians were the only ones in Cornwall who would pick their crops for a pittance.